Colin J. Stalter
Subscribe to Colin J. Stalter's PostsColin J. Stalter focuses his practice on patent litigation, client counseling, and prosecution. He has experience working with large technology companies on complex intellectual property matters including strategic acquisitions, claim chart drafting, portfolio valuation, freedom to operate opinions, and inter partes review. Colin holds a BS in systems engineering and design, and has particular experience in the consumer electronics, telecommunications, and content delivery industries. Read Colin Stalter's full bio.
Impossible; Cloud Storage Patent Claims Invalid for Indefiniteness or Not Infringed
By Colin J. Stalter on Feb 25, 2021
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s determination that three patents directed to data synchronization were indefinite as lacking sufficient disclosed structure to support a means plus function claim element, as impossible in terms of claim scope or not infringed. Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Dropbox. Inc., Case Nos. 19-2196,...
Continue Reading
2020 IP Law Year in Review: Patents
By Amol Parikh, Cecilia Choy, Amy Mahan, PhD, Hala Mourad, Colin J. Stalter and Elizabeth Teter on Jan 28, 2021
Posted In Patents
Executive Summary In 2020, the US Supreme Court and Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit continued to refine key aspects of intellectual property law on issues that will have an impact on litigation, patent prosecution and business strategy. This Special Report discusses some of the most important decisions. The Federal Circuit issued several panel...
Continue Reading
New or Not, Object-Oriented Simulation Patent Ineligible Under § 101
By Colin J. Stalter on Jan 14, 2021
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s pleadings-stage determination that patent claims directed to an object-oriented simulation were subject matter ineligible under 35 USC § 101. Simio, LLC v. FlexSim Software Prod., Inc., Case No. 20-1171 (Fed. Cir. Dec 29, 2020) (Prost, C.J.). Simio filed suit against FlexSim for...
Continue Reading
Size Matters in Obviousness Analysis
By Colin J. Stalter on Oct 29, 2020
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) decisions, finding that the Board erred in its construction of certain claim terms relating to an artificial heart valve that does not require removal of the damaged native heart valve. St. Jude...
Continue Reading
Logic to Modify: Even Deceptive Intent Does Not Bar Inventorship Correction
By Colin J. Stalter on Sep 16, 2020
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated a district court invalidity determination finding that judicial estoppel prevented a patent owner from relisting an inventor previously removed for strategic litigation purposes. Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc., Case Nos. 19-2015, -2387 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 28, 2020) (Prost, C.J.). Egenera sued Cisco for infringement...
Continue Reading
Bugs in Space? Star Trek Plotline Does Not Infringe Tardigrade Video Game
By Colin J. Stalter on Aug 27, 2020
Posted In Copyrights
The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a district court’s pleadings-stage determination that certain Star Trek: Discovery characters and plotlines did not infringe copyrighted elements of a video game because there was not substantial similarity between protectible elements of the video game and the Discovery episodes. Abdin v. CBS Broad. Inc., Case...
Continue Reading
Explain Yourself: “Untethered” Obviousness Determination Reversed
By Colin J. Stalter on Aug 13, 2020
Posted In America Invents Act, Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated in part and remanded a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) determination of unpatentability because the Board did not adequately support its reasoning as to certain claims. Alacritech, Inc. v. Intel Corp., Case No. 19-1467 (Fed. Cir. July 31, 2020) (Stoll, J.). Intel petitioned for...
Continue Reading
Patent Owners Beware: Serial Filings, Rent-Seeking May Be Grounds for Adverse Fee Award
By Colin J. Stalter on Jul 15, 2020
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded a district court’s denial of attorney’s fees to an accused infringer, finding the district court did not properly consider the Patent Owner’s manner of litigation, including the history of plaintiff’s actions in other jurisdictions and the broader context of its litigation practices. Elec....
Continue Reading
South Carolina Supreme Court Cannot Find “Economic Value” to Support Trade Secret
By Colin J. Stalter on Jun 17, 2020
Posted In Trade Secrets
The South Carolina Supreme Court (S.C. Supreme Court) affirmed a state Court of Appeals finding that information taken by a minority LLC member did not have the requisite independent value to be considered a “trade secret” under the state’s Trade Secrets Act. Wilson v. Gandis, Case No. 27980 (S.C. June 3, 2020) (James, C.J.). In response...
Continue Reading
Verdict Delivered: Shipment Notification Claims are Patent Ineligible—Even with Security Flair
By Colin J. Stalter on May 28, 2020
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s pleadings-stage determination that a patent claim directed to a delivery notification system was subject matter ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Elec. Commc’n Techs., LLC v. ShoppersChoice.com, LLC, Case No. 19-1587 (Fed. Cir. May 14, 2020) (Prost, C.J.).
Continue Reading
