Cecilia Choy, PhD
Subscribe to Cecilia Choy, PhD's Posts2020 IP Law Year in Review: Patents
By Amol Parikh and Cecilia Choy, PhD on Jan 28, 2021
Posted In Patents
Executive Summary In 2020, the US Supreme Court and Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit continued to refine key aspects of intellectual property law on issues that will have an impact on litigation, patent prosecution and business strategy. This Special Report discusses some of the most important decisions. The Federal Circuit issued several panel...
Continue Reading
Res Judicata on Procedural Grounds Precludes Similar Claims Arising After Prior Judgment
By Cecilia Choy, PhD on Sep 2, 2020
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court decision that res judicata can apply to dismissals on procedural grounds and to claims arising after a prior judgment. Sowinski v. California Air Resources Board, Case No. 19-1558 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 21, 2020) (Newman, J.) Richard Sowinski is the inventor of a...
Continue Reading
A Party May Have Standing Even with Incorrect Patent Assignment
By Cecilia Choy, PhD on May 27, 2020
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s decision that a reformation of an incorrect assignment supports Article III standing and affirmed the court’s prejudgment interest award. Schwendimann v. Arkwright Advanced Coating, Inc., Case Nos. 18-2416, 19-1012 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2020) (Wallach, J.) (Reyna, J. dissenting).
Continue Reading
Assignor Estoppel Does Not Apply to AIA Challenges
By Cecilia Choy, PhD on May 7, 2020
Posted In America Invents Act, Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reiterated that while assignor estoppel prevents a party that assigned a patent to another party from later challenging the validity of the assigned patent in district court, it does not preclude the party from challenging the validity of the assigned patent in an America Invents Act...
Continue Reading
“Lightly Sketched” Characters Not Copyrightable
By Cecilia Choy, PhD on Apr 2, 2020
Posted In Copyrights
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed that “lightly sketched anthropomorphized characters representing human emotions” were not copyrightable. Daniels v. Walt Disney Co., Case No. 18-55635 (9th Cir. Mar. 16, 2020) (McKeown, J.). Denise Daniels created The Moodsters Company. The Moodsters were five named characters, each color-coded to an emotion. The Moodsters...
Continue Reading




