Thomas DaMario

Subscribe to Thomas DaMario's Posts
Thomas DaMario focuses his practice on intellectual property litigation and patent prosecution. Read Thomas DaMario's full bio.

Hypothetical Device Doesn’t Meet Domestic Industry Requirement


By on Mar 17, 2022
Posted In Patents

In a consolidated appeal from the International Trade Commission (Commission) and two inter partes review (IPR) proceedings before the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (Board), the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Commission’s findings that a hypothetical device does not meet the domestic industry requirement, as well as findings by the...

Continue Reading



2022 IP Outlook Report: The Developments Shaping Patent Law


By , , , , , and on Feb 17, 2022
Posted In Patents

Key Takeaways and Outlook for 2022 Tracking with this era’s continuation and uncertainty trends―global supply chain disruption, innovation outpacing legislation, the unstoppable internet of [all the] things (IoT)―2022 is expected to be another busy year in the world of patent litigation. We fully expect persistence in these spaces: Patents/SEP FRAND Licensing Venue Developments Subject Matter...

Continue Reading



IPR Petition Cannot Be Based on Applicant Admitted Prior Art


By on Feb 10, 2022
Posted In Patents

Addressing the type of prior art that may form the basis of an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated an unpatentability finding based on “applicant admitted prior art” in the challenged patent. Qualcomm Inc. v. Apple Inc., Case Nos. 20-1558, -1559 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 1, 2022)...

Continue Reading



Failing to Address All Reasons for Noninfringement Renders Appeal Moot


By on Oct 14, 2021
Posted In Patents

In deciding whether the district court correctly interpreted various claim terms in four patents related to communication techniques used in computer gaming technology, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that rendering a decision as to the terms for at least two of the patents would be moot. Accordingly, the Federal Circuit...

Continue Reading



Greek God or Continent? Defining “Confusing Similarity” under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act


By on Sep 2, 2021
Posted In Trademarks

Examining whether a registered mark and a domain name were confusingly similar under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), the US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the trademark owner because the mark and domains are nearly identical in sight, sound and meaning....

Continue Reading



Prosecution History Prevents Patent Owner from “Intercepting” Win on Appeal


By on May 20, 2021
Posted In Patents

In reviewing whether the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (Board) correctly interpreted the meaning of “intercepting” in the context of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) technology, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that the claim language and prosecution history supported the Board’s decision. The Court thus affirmed the Board’s construction and...

Continue Reading



2G or Not 2G: Patent License Applies to Future Generation Wireless Networks


By on Feb 18, 2021
Posted In Patents

In interpreting a patent license agreement originally drafted in the era of third generation (3G) cellular networks, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that the license agreement covered subsequent wireless network generations, affirming a district court decision that infringement claims were barred by the license agreement and the doctrine of patent...

Continue Reading



Stick to the Fax: Conflicting Statements Made During Prosecution Lead to Indefiniteness


By on Feb 18, 2021
Posted In Patents

In deciding whether use of the term “passive link” to define a connection between a computer terminal and a fax machine rendered a patent claim indefinite, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding of invalidity based on conflicting statements made by the patent owner during prosecution. Infinity Computer...

Continue Reading



Jetting along the Thin Line between Appellate Standing and Admitting Infringement


By on Jan 14, 2021
Posted In Patents

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that an inter partes review (IPR) petitioner that had not been accused of infringement had standing to appeal a final decision in an IPR because the petitioner alleged facts establishing that there was a substantial risk of infringement of the challenged claims. General Elec. Co....

Continue Reading



Amended Opinion Hedges Constitutionality of Punitive Damages Award


By on Dec 10, 2020
Posted In Trade Secrets

The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit amended its August 2020 opinion in Epic Systems v. Tata Consultancy to clarify that its analysis of punitive damages applies only to this particular case. Epic Systems Corp. v. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., Case Nos. 19-1528, -1613 (7th Cir. Nov. 19, 2020) (Kanne, J.) In the...

Continue Reading



BLOG EDITORS

STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES