Thomas DaMario
PTAB MTA Pilot Program to the Rescue
By Thomas DaMario on Aug 1, 2024
Posted In Patents
On review of a final written decision from the Patent Trial & Appeal Board in an inter partes review (IPR), the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that all challenged claims were obvious but left open the possibility of the patent owner amending the claims under the Motion to Amend (MTA) Pilot...
Continue Reading
PTO Collaborates With UK Counterpart to Address Standard-Essential Patents
By Thomas DaMario on Jun 13, 2024
Posted In Patents
On June 3, 2024, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) Director Kathi Vidal and Chief Executive Officer of the UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) Adam Williams signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) designed to tackle various issues related to standard-essential patents (SEPs). SEPs are patents that have...
Continue Reading
International Trade Commission Seeks Feedback on Proposed Updates to Practice and Procedure
By Thomas DaMario on Apr 18, 2024
Posted In Uncategorized
The US International Trade Commission issued a Federal Register notice of proposed rulemaking related to 19 C.F.R. Parts 201, 205, 207 and 210, which govern the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. The Commission seeks feedback by May 20, 2024. Proposed Rules, 89 Fed. Reg. 61, 22012-39 (Mar. 28, 2024). The notice specifies that the...
Continue Reading
Mandamus Denied but Jurisdictional Door Left Open a Crack
By Thomas DaMario on Apr 4, 2024
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a patent owner’s writ of mandamus seeking to prevent a defendant from amending its answer to add an affirmative licensing defense, but also noted that the defense was added only after the district court found that there were no remaining claims. In re VLSI Technology...
Continue Reading
Don’t Assume Sweet Success: Forum Selection Clause Doesn’t Preclude IPR
By Thomas DaMario on Jan 11, 2024
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction seeking to bar a petitioner from challenging certain patents at the US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) because of a forum selection clause in a settlement agreement. The Court found that the patent owner was unlikely to...
Continue Reading
Sound the Alarm: Reasonable Royalty Apportionment Analysis Overlooks “Sleep State”
By Thomas DaMario on Dec 14, 2023
Posted In Patents
After a jury found infringement of two patents and awarded almost $2.2 billion in damages, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the infringement finding for one asserted patent, vacated the damages award for the other asserted patent, and reversed the district court’s refusal to allow the alleged infringer to add a...
Continue Reading
Say Goodbye: Argument Not Presented in IPR Petition Is Waived
By Thomas DaMario on Nov 2, 2023
Posted In Patents
In a split decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a Patent Trial & Appeal Board patentability determination, finding that the challenger’s appeal arguments were not raised in its inter partes review (IPR) petitions and were therefore waived. Netflix, Inc. v. DivX, LLC, Case Nos. 22-1203; -1204 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 25,...
Continue Reading
Remedies as Big as Your Bamba
By Thomas DaMario on Aug 10, 2023
Posted In Trademarks
Following the district court’s finding of trademark infringement on summary judgment, the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court’s subsequent award of profits, costs and attorneys’ fees in favor of the trademark holder. La Bamba Licensing, LLC v. La Bamba Authentic Mexican Cuisine, Inc., nka La Villa Rica Mexican Cuisine,...
Continue Reading
The Best Option Is Obviously Not the Only Option
By Thomas DaMario on Jun 22, 2023
Posted In Patents
Following a jury verdict finding infringement of two patents and awarding $2.2 billion, the Patent Trial & Appeal Board issued a final written decision finding all claims in one of the asserted patents invalid. The Board explained that an asserted prior art combination only needs to be a suitable option, not the best option. Patent...
Continue Reading
Heart-to-Heart on Reduction to Practice: When It Comes to Testing, How Much Is Enough?
By Thomas DaMario on Jun 1, 2023
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a Patent Trial & Appeal Board decision that the patent owner successfully demonstrated that the claimed heart catheter invention was conceived and reduced to practice prior to the effective date of the reference, by record evidence of adequate testing to demonstrate that the invention would...
Continue Reading