Tyler Jackson

Subscribe to Tyler Jackson's Posts
Tyler Jackson focuses her practice on intellectual property litigation matters. Read Tyler Jackson's full bio.

Shocking: Fifth Circuit affirms disgorgement award based on willful infringement


By on May 21, 2026
Posted In Trademarks

The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed a finding of trademark infringement and unfair competition under the Lanham Act and Texas law, upholding an award of profits based on willful infringement. The Court vacated and remanded the permanent injunction as overbroad, however. Trojan Battery Co., L.L.C. v. Golf Carts of Cypress, L.L.C.,...

Continue Reading



Missed delivery: Institution decision statutorily unreviewable


By on May 7, 2026
Posted In America Invents Act, Patents

Addressing the scope of appellate review under the America Invents Act, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit determined that challenges grounded in 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(2)’s real-party-in-interest requirement are unreviewable where they are closely tied to the Patent Trial & Appeal Board’s institution decision. Fed. Express Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No....

Continue Reading



Public use, even without explicit public disclosure, is patent bar under pre-AIA § 102(b)


By on Apr 23, 2026
Posted In Patents

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed summary judgment of invalidity under the pre-America Invents Act (AIA) on sale bar, holding that a third party sale to the public of a product embodying a patented method and apparatus can trigger invalidity even where details of the invention were not expressly disclosed. Definitive...

Continue Reading



“X” marks the spot: A single DuPont factor may be dispositive


By on Apr 16, 2026
Posted In Trademarks

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed dismissal of a trademark opposition, concluding that a single DuPont factor may be sufficient on its own to support a finding of no likelihood of confusion. Fuente Mktg. Ltd. v. Vaporous Techs., LLC, Case No. 24-1460 (Fed. Cir. April 8, 2026) (Prost, Taranto, Hughes, JJ.)...

Continue Reading



Corresponding disclosed structure? Only what’s necessary to perform a recited function


By on Mar 26, 2026
Posted In Patents

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the disclosure of an added function in the specification of a patent should not affect the structure necessary to meet the recited function in a Section 112(f) claim element. Gramm v. Deere & Co., Case No. 24-1598 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2026) (Lourie, Reyna,...

Continue Reading



The meaning is plain as day: Just follow the grammar


By on Feb 26, 2026
Posted In Patents

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed and vacated a decision by the Patent Trial & Appeal Board, explaining that the Board failed to consider common textual modifier language when applying the plain meaning to a disputed claim term. Netflix, Inc. v. DivX, LLC, Case No. 24-1541 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 13, 2026)...

Continue Reading



STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES